|
| |||
|
The following transcript is protected under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License. Link to Audio and Episode Info Here
Show Transcript Deconstructing Dinner Kootenay Co-op Radio CJLY Nelson, B.C. Canada November
29, 2007 Title:
Co-operatives: Alternatives to Industrial Food III (Heritage Foodservice
Co-operative) Producer/Host:
Jon Steinman Transcript:
Carol Elliott Jon Steinman: And welcome to Deconstructing Dinner,
produced in the studios of Kootenay Co-op Radio CJLY in Nelson, British
Columbia. I'm Jon Steinman, and today's broadcast marks the culmination of a
widespread and in-depth investigation into an exciting new business being
formed on Vancouver Island. Recent
polls have been suggesting that close to three quarters of Canadians are
now looking for food grown by local farmers and produced by local businesses.
But what is now obvious to anyone who fits into this demographic, demand far
outweighs supply. While some small grocery stores and independent restaurants
are making efforts to link up with farmers to source options for local food,
the process is often far from efficient. And while the number of these businesses
now taking on such a challenge is increasing, they represent only a minute
fraction of overall Canadian foodservice and grocery operations that are
offering local food to their customers. But
of course the reason for such difficulty that any Canadian business would face
when seeking out food grown within their region is that the infrastructure that
once existed to facilitate a regional food system has been hollowed out
and replaced with a system that supports long-distance global transportation of
food. And what makes today's broadcast so exciting is that, for the next hour,
we will be exploring the creation of a business that is looking to resurrect
and recreate a model for a regional foodservice distribution system that could
maybe provide a working example of how Canadian communities can begin
reclaiming control of local food systems and reinvigorate local economies. This
broadcast marks Part III of the ongoing series titled "Co-operatives:
Alternatives to Industrial Food," and on today's broadcast we explore the
Heritage Foodservice Co-operative Association just recently formed on Vancouver
Island. Lending their voice to the program will be Bill Code of the Island
Farmers' Alliance; Karin Lengger of Small Potatoes Urban Delivery (also known
as SPUD); Graham Morry of the Nanaimo Association for Community Living;
Marjorie Stewart of Nanaimo Foodshare; James Street of the North Vancouver
Island Chefs Association; and Frank Moreland and Sandra Mark of Edible
Strategies. Why
so many voices on the show, you may be asking? Well, this new business being
formed to challenge the industrial food system requires widespread involvement
from many different groups and businesses, and we will hear from all of them to
best illustrate the need for such collaboration in order to ensure social and
environmental values don't get tossed out in favour of a single bottom line.
Most importantly, this is a business that will be looking to ensure farmers receive
their fair share of that final food dollar, and it could be said that the
Heritage Foodservice Co-operative is introducing a model for local, fair trade.
increase music and fade out Jon Steinman: One quick mention before we embark on
today's broadcast. There has been quite the level of interest from listeners in
recent weeks to give Deconstructing Dinner as a gift in this upcoming holiday
season. We are providing such an option on our website where we are offering
Deconstructing Dinner CDs featuring Juno-award nominee and musician Adham
Shaikh. The CD features highlights of all broadcasts aired between January and
May of this year, and Adham Shaikh has created an exclusive soundtrack to
accompany the highlights that help document how this program each week looks
behind the scenes of our global food system and presents alternatives that are
more socially and environmentally responsible. Located
on the top-right corner of the Deconstructing Dinner website is a link to a
page where you can order these CDs. And that website is
cjly.net/deconstructingdinner. All proceeds from the sale of this limited
edition printing will help support Deconstructing Dinner. soundbite
Jon Steinman: It's important to first launch today's
topic with a brief acknowledgement of the rapidly changing face of business
ethics in today's marketplace. As became evident during our recent two-part
series on the marketing of biofuels around the world, the prevalence of
greenwashing is rampant. As environmental concerns are on the top of the list
for most Canadians, virtually every company operating within our borders has
taken it upon themselves to paint their businesses as being clean, green,
environmentally friendly and socially responsible. Now
while some of these rebranding efforts are simply words on paper, there are of
course many companies who are indeed making efforts to reorganize their
operations and adopt more ethical guidelines. But there's a threat to such a
direction, and that threat comes from the very foundation upon which many of
these businesses are formed: that so long as a company is bound to their
shareholders (and, in being so, also bound to maximizing profits), the ability
to maintain such environmental and social goals becomes next to impossible.
What makes the formation of the business that will be focused on today so exciting
is that incorporated into the model of this business are mechanisms to ensure
that the ethical values that are becoming increasingly important will not fall
to the wayside as the business grows. And
we'll learn more about how this will indeed plays out as this show evolves, but
first, let's travel to Nanaimo. In October of this year I spent a few days
speaking with many of those involved in the formation of this new model of
fostering a more sustainable local food system. As part of my time there, I recorded
Frank Moreland of Edible Strategies making the first public announcement of the
Heritage Foodservice Co-operative and the Islands Good Food Initiative that
helped spawn the creation of this business. With
their home in the community of Fanny Bay, Edible Strategies is a small
consulting group working with various partners in the development of projects
to help re-localize the food system. Vancouver Island at one point grew and
produced most of the food consumed on the Island, but since the rapid expansion
of the industrial food system the Island now grows less than ten per
cent of the food consumed. This problem led to the formation of what has been
called the Islands Good Food Initiative, organized by a group of community
organizations, farmers, small scale food processors and locally owned food
businesses who together are wishing to work towards re-localizing their food
system. As part of this
initiative, Frank Moreland and Sandra Mark of Edible Strategies have been
working on the formation of one business to help foster such a system. And
here's Frank Moreland being introduced by Jen Cody, the Chair of the BC Food
Systems Network. Jen Cody: And that's part of the reason why we invited Frank Moreland
to come and speak with us this evening. He's got a bit of the local
perspective. He's been working on a number of strategies to help connect
farmers up with buyers. And he's also produced some edible strategies around
looking at what's preventing people from being able to buy locally and what's
preventing farmers from being able to sell locally. So welcome, Frank. (audience: applause) Frank Moreland: So I'd like to
start pretty much where Brent started. If we pay more for our food - money that
actually gets to the farmers - then we are investing in a local food system. We
may pay twenty per cent more for local food, or more than that, but we have to
look at that as an investment in our local food system. We saw in his numbers
that farmers are two per cent of the population. They've known these problems that
Brent had presented for quite a long time: they are living them. What they need
is us, the eaters that aren't part of that two per cent, to join and support
them. And what I am going to be talking about is an actual formal, ethical
business that we are creating on Vancouver Island to do that. We are going from the buy local first, as Brent was saying. First and
foremost local and then organic, otherwise the organic will be from off-shore,
through Walmart, and we want to be the price makers. Somebody was asking about what's beyond the farmers' market? The Island
Good Food Initiative is formally linking farmers and food businesses so that we
can brand Vancouver Island "organically grown" (we may not be getting around to
the certification) food with the family farms to meet foodservice market
channels. So foodservice is institutional buying and the restaurants. We want to partner up with the farmers' markets and help them deliver to
the consumers there, but we would also like to work with the farmers' markets
in expanding so that they can also provide food through us - their number twos
and threes - which can be preserved through the foodservice system. Partnerships we need - very important. The farmers are only two per cent.
We need the farmers, the schools, the institutions, the chefs, the government,
the local business and the consumer supported agriculture. So we are going to
focus on institutional and foodservice leaders. Jon Steinman: Two key points raised by Frank Moreland in that clip were
the importance of partnerships and their focus on the foodservice sector. Why
partnerships are so key to re-localizing a food system will become more evident
as this broadcast progresses. We will also learn why foodservice is the focus
for this local food business, with two reasons just up front here being volume
and the mandates that many institutions look to uphold in providing their
clients with healthy food. As local food is now recognized as being healthier,
this new business is unique in that it is using this health lens as a means
through which to emphasize the importance of what it is they're doing. There
has been a significant amount of research that has gone into the formation of
the Heritage Foodservice Co-operative, some of which focused on the needs of
these bulk purchasers of food and the needs of farmers. Frank Moreland: So of all the
institutions we asked them the range of their annual food budget. From 114,
they spend between $6,000,000 to $10,000,000 dollars every year on food. So
that's 114 of the 600 that exist on the Island. Then we had a practicum student that talked with the farmers that looked
at the recent reports to find out what the issues for the farmers are: we've
heard land prices; the availability of labour; government regulations; low food
prices due to the cheap imports; high cost of production; lack of business
acumen by farmers; lack of local distribution infrastructure; lack of marketing
acumen; low farm income; limited local production; and lack of market access. So from the B.C. Medical Service report we recommended future research to
do that would be valuable for the farmers, for the ethical small food
businesses on Vancouver Island, and for the other supportive groups that want
to buy their food (Slow Food movements, food security movements, community
development organizations that have good food boxes or community kitchens).
They all need food and they all would like to buy food if it was convenient and
competitively priced. So for the next research that we are looking at, we'd like to propose
that the current research initiative be followed by action research. And we'd
like to start on that in January to encourage food purchasers and agencies -
the decision makers in the agencies - to work together, because a lot of the
time the people at the top in an institutional purchasing situation do not
communicate with the person that's actually buying the food. So we need inside
institutions for them to be discussing and actually setting the budget at a few
points over the Mexican food so that we can provide the local food at the cost
of production that the farmers need to receive. We've been working with about thirty particular farmers really closely in
the last year and there's quite a few that have actually developed
institutional contracts or personal contracts with individual restaurants, like
Kingfisher and Gerry Pattison Farms in the Comox Valley, where I'm from. But they're running up against walls. Kingfisher can use three hundred
pounds of organic carrots in a month and one farmer can't do that. So we really
have to consolidate a lot of the smaller farmers so that they can produce
enough and we can collect them and wash them and grade them and add value for
the institutions. John Steinman: And this is Deconstructing Dinner and those last two clips
were of Frank Moreland speaking in October in Nanaimo at an event hosted by
Food Link Nanaimo. Now I did sit down
with Frank Moreland and Sandra Mark of Edible Strategies to learn more about
how they've proposed to help re-localize their food system. Frank introduced to
me that what they're doing is challenging the dominant model of supply chains
by instead creating a value chain. The supply chains currently
dominating our food system have allowed for some links within that chain to
extract a disproportionate amount of that final food dollar. A value chain, on
the other hand, looks to ensure that every link along the chain receives their
fair share, with the most important link being the farmer. Frank Moreland: The existing global supply chain has
hollowed out the local food systems. That means basically that the actual
physical infrastructure - the loading docks, the trucks - the infrastructure
doesn't exist anymore for short distance food chains. A food chain is jargon to
describe the businesses that are connecting the farmer to the eater. And a
lot of great work by the NFU shows how the supply chain actually vacuums
profits from the productive farmer. So one of the existing models for a
solution is the value chain, which helps people produce food and move away from
commodity export strategies to more preparing value-added food for a local food
system. But, see there is a great demand and a lot of farmers are trying to
convert but neither side can find the trucks and the loading docks - the
infrastructure for the short distance transportation and value-adding of food. Jon Steinman: With the transportation and loading
docks within communities now most often being controlled by those businesses
profiting off of the unfair supply chain, how an alternative system can enter
into the market is a tough obstacle to navigate around. But herein introduces
one of the important segments of this new re-localizing model. Operating across
the country within most Canadian communities are small-scale businesses and
organizations already working towards achieving a more responsible local food
system. And so instead of reinventing the wheel, the Heritage Foodservice
Co-operative is looking to first bring those existing businesses
together and take advantage of what's already in place. In a nutshell, what
this new co-operative will be looking to achieve is the connecting of farmers
with labour, with transportation, with processing-and packing facilities, with
distribution, with institutional food purchasers and, finally, with you and I
as the final consumer. So
let's first explore one of the more interested stakeholders in the formation of
this co-operative, and that is SPUD, also known as Small Potatoes Urban
Delivery. Back in June of 2006, Deconstructing Dinner ran a feature on this
unique on-line grocery delivery company with operations in Calgary, Seattle,
the Greater Vancouver area, and Vancouver Island. To learn more about how
SPUD's business fits into the formation of this new co-operative, I spoke over
the phone with Karin Lengger, the General Manager of SPUD's Vancouver Island
operations, and she outlines one of the major problems facing the Islands' food
supply. Karin Lengger: Well, I think there are a few really significant things
missing from the food system on Vancouver Island, and one is coordination.
Unlike the Lower Mainland, where there is more supply and there are formalized
distribution streams, that really isn't so much the case here for local
products. It is for products being imported to the Island but not for local
products. So I think the coordination of getting the products grown and to the
user is going to be huge for this area. Jon Steinman: SPUD is an ideal business to become part
of this new co-operative because they maintain what is known as a triple-bottom
line, which is a measure of success that incorporates social and environmental
outcomes. Karin Lengger: We're very much interested in
the triple-bottom line way of doing business. So we're interested in supporting
our suppliers to the extent that we can, and definitely supporting local
farmers is high on our agenda, for a
number of reasons. One is it's really the right thing to do, from a purely
business sense. In the long term we don't feel that we will have a business
unless we have a local food supply. So from a business standpoint it makes good
sense for us to support local farmers. And just from individual and from a
philosophical standpoint, we certainly believe that that's the right thing to
do. So right now we do a lot internally as a business,
helping and working with farmers and trying to reach out to farmers to get more
local products on our list. I think that's one of the big things that this
co-operative is going to help us with because it's actually quite a bit of
work, and we're not really in business to do that, and we're not experts at it,
so we do the best we can. I think this co-op will provide an opportunity for us
to know where the products are, where the farmers are, and to be able to have
sort of a one-stop shopping: to buy products from local farmers and know that
they're going to benefit from that whole stream of the co-op. And that is
really important to us - that the farmer stops getting the short end of the
stick, which typically has been happening as you know. Jon Steinman: As Frank Moreland introduced just
earlier, there is a gap in the ability for farmers to find the necessary
transportation and distribution of their product, and SPUD's current presence
on the Island provides one piece of this puzzle. Karin Lengger:
We're hoping to as a business be able to also provide assistance to the co-op.
Our role will probably be in the longer term some help with distribution up and
down the Island - moving product from farm to processing kitchen, for instance
- and also to help with some IT help,
because the co-op intends to have an active, on-line presence. Our warehouse is located in Esquimalt. The intention
of the co-op is to have growing happening up and down the Island in all the
agricultural zones, and to develop processing kitchens and cold storage in the
areas where the farmers are. And so there will be a need to move product around
from farm to field. But right now we are located in Esquimalt and distributing
all the way up to Gold River. So our trucks are already on the road, and we can
tie that in with picking up and delivering things for the co-op as well. Jon Steinman: As SPUD's current infrastructure will
assist in the operation of the Heritage Foodservice Co-operative, the
Co-operative will also help SPUD in better realizing the company's mission of
providing as much local food to their customers as possible. Karin Lengger: I think the biggest thing the co-op is going to provide for
us is more local food, and knowing where the local food is, and getting access
to the people growing the local food. Right now, if we can find a product on
the Island that we need to sell, we'll buy it preferentially from the Island,
always. But we have to bring in food from all over British Columbia, that's for
sure. Even in the highest season of growing - in the summer time - we are still
bringing food over because we can't source it on the Island here. So
there is a huge opportunity for more growing to take place. But the farmers
growing the food need to be financially sustainable, that's for sure. And
hopefully this co-op will move them in that direction. Jon Steinman: And that was Karin Lengger of Small
Potatoes Urban Delivery (also known as SPUD). Karin is one of the four founding
Directors of this new co-operative and I spoke with her over the phone from her
office in Victoria. Now
Karin's last comment addresses the foundational piece in the puzzle of
accessing local food: the farmer. And farmers will, too, be members of the
Heritage Foodservice Co-operative. One
of the individuals who has also been involved in the formation of this co-op is
Bill Code, the President of the Island Farmers' Alliance, that represents
farmers and other organizations on the Island. The group manages the "Fresh
from the Island" logo found on many Vancouver Island food products. Bill is a
resident of Duncan, and he shared with me why the IFA got involved in this new
co-operative. Bill Code: I was approached early on because I was the President of
the Island Farmers' Alliance and I've always been keen on those issues. I was
approached by them to be the original farmer of the group of five when we had
our inaugural meeting. It's an opportunity for me as a farmer but then also as
a member of other farmers and interested consumers to the local food, to try
and really make that a possibility rather than the farmer trying to develop
multiple personalities (by raising the food, processing the food, marketing the
food, going to the farmers' markets when they're already busy in their personally
employed job) to support their farming habits. Jon Steinman: As preserving the viability and
sustainability of farming is the most vital component of re-localizing a food
system, Bill outlines one of the major benefits to farmers that this Heritage Foodservice
Co-operative will provide. Bill Code: I think the biggest is to allow the farmer more opportunity
to time on their farm improving their production when they've already been
compromised doing several things in marketing the produce or going to the
farmers' markets and all those other scenarios. So by
doing that we need to essentially put some profit in the farmer's hands.
Because if you spend a dollar on food a hundred years ago, then forty cents
would get back to the farmer. Today if you spend a dollar on food, seven cents
gets back to the farmer. But by improving the value added and the local food
chain's ability then that can increase. Not only that, we've checked things
through, and there are a lot of consumers willing to pay more for quality food
if they know it's local. Jon Steinman: And that was Bill Code of the Island
Farmers' Alliance. And this is Deconstructing Dinner and Part III of our
ongoing series here on the program titled "Co-operatives: Alternatives to
Industrial Food." Today we are looking at the formation of a new co-operative
on Vancouver Island that is looking to re-localize the food system and, in
doing so, create more access for Island residents to food grown and processed on
the Island. Now
one recurring comment that may concern some listeners is the reference to the
consumer needing to pay more for their food in order to preserve and enhance
the presence of local food production. While such a suggestion is most
certainly true given Canadians spend the least of our disposable income on food
(less than ten per cent), it does raise the question of what about those who
are spending upwards to forty per cent of their disposable income. Where will they
find the money to afford this food? And
here introduces one of the most socially responsible pieces of this new
co-operative in that, first and foremost, the idea for the Co-op was created
upon recognizing the threats to services that provide inexpensive food to
marginalized populations. Many of you have probably heard of the good food box
programs operating across the country that look to provide healthy food to such
marginalized populations. Frank Moreland and Sandra Mark of Edible Strategies
describe how the idea of this new business was spawned out of the threats
facing good food box programs throughout Canada. Frank Moreland: Well, from the research with the good
food box program and finding that each program was duplicating the
administration, like ordering and payment and packing and delivering, some of
these efficiencies could be looked at from a business point of view and
commercial volumes. If we link it with institutional market demand and
restaurant demand we could achieve volumes of scale to make it a partial
program of what we are doing. So to get the
research from the institutional buyers on the Island we hired five researchers
that actually worked in communities with good food box programs. We thought it
would be very important to help train them so that they could discuss
purchasers from institutions that purchase hundreds of thousands of dollars of
food a year. They would get a good understanding on how the institutional
market works for fresh foods and that. Sandra Mark: The interesting result of doing this kind of research using
a health lens was that the people who are in the demand side and wanting to see
more food out there really do not understand the supply problems. This came out
very clearly; that even purchasers were unaware of the issues because they
aren't involved in that discussion. In institutions that are publicly funded
they are not involved in those discussions. The community people are not
involved in the discussions with farmers. There are all these different silos
of people who have some kind of concern or knowledge but they aren't connected
in any fashion. So,
the idea for the Islands' Good Food Initiative arose to say, okay, let us bring
all those people to the same table. Let's get representatives from all parts of
the system who have concern from one way or another - the farmers, the labour,
the non-profit organizations who are concerned with health and social
well-being and food security, the institutions, the restaurants. Let's get all
these people into the same room to say, "How can we solve this problem?"
Because every single actor in this group of people wants to solve the problem,
they just all feel frustrated because they don't know what to do. Somebody else
needs to do something because they can't figure out what to do. So,
the result is now we are saying, "Let's figure out what to do." And in fact
what it comes to is rebuilding that infrastructure that was lost as we all fell
down and were happy to get cheap food coming in from the industrialized food
system until most recently we're starting to realize that we have paid a huge price
for this cheap food. Jon Steinman: Now the social value to be found in
incorporating the social services side of food distribution into the for-profit
side of a business is quite revolutionary. Government funding for such services
has decreased significantly and, in some cases, altogether. Sandra Mark further
expands on the connection between the good food box programs operating on the
island and the Heritage Foodservice Co-operative. Sandra Mark: The Good Food Box program, as we looked at what's happening
in B.C. and we looked at what's happening across the country, clearly actually
influences people's eating behaviour and does have impact on their health. In talking to the
Good Food Box people we said to them, "Look, if you get the Ministry to understand
this, perhaps they would in fact give you the money to do this properly."
However, that is a long road to hoe to get the message through. In a sense, a
lot of funders are tired of the Good Food Box program because it has not become
sustainable. So, the other thing
that we said to the Good Food Box group was, "Look, lots of people are now
interested in local food. There is this problem of getting that food happening
and getting it to the people who want it. So maybe we should look if there's
feasibility to link between the desire of the general population to get local
food and your desire to increase the health of the people that you are dealing
with as well as the general population. Maybe if we link these two demands we
would in fact be able to start liberating the resources needed to start
rebuilding the infrastructure that's going to be required if we are going to
re-insert a local food system here." Jon Steinman: We've now heard from two of the four
founding Board of Directors of the Heritage Foodservice Co-operative. And a
third is Marjorie Stewart, the Chair of Nanaimo Foodshare. I spoke with
Marjorie while attending a trial farmers' market taking place in Nanaimo, and
she explains who Nanaimo Foodshare is. Marjorie Stewart: Nanaimo Foodshare is a seven-year-old
agency in this community. It was originally established to be a network for
food security interested agencies, which would include emergency food groups
and food advocacy groups. Unfortunately, the Canada Revenue Agency said you
can't at one and the same time be a charity and a network. Of course, you can't
track the money, can you - the donations. So at
that point Foodshare morphed into an independent charitable agency, which now
delivers various projects. As of this moment, as the Chair of this society I am
responsible for an agency with roughly a quarter of a million dollar budget,
nearly all of which is dedicated to program delivery and very little of which
is available for operating expenses, which is a common obstacle to agencies attempting
to do social programs. Jon Steinman: Nanaimo Foodshare operates the largest
of the good food box programs on the island, and Marjorie Stewart explains how
it's this that led Foodshare to become involved in the Heritage Foodservice
Co-operative. Marjorie Stewart: Well, how we connect in is that this
initiative is an initiative of all the good food box projects on Vancouver
Island. One way or another Nanaimo seems to be the largest, and therefore we
took the responsibility of doing the business administration for the
initiative, which is at the research stage. We're as interested as anybody else
in seeing what comes out of the potential business models that we could adopt
and the potential business partnerships that we could take on. One
of the interesting things about Nanaimo Foodshare is that there was a huge
community fund drive to buy a building. And in the building we have four
agencies: we have Nanaimo Foodshare; we have supportive apartment living, who
have morphed into the people who put together most of the good food boxes; we
have community kitchens, where they do projects now that involve teaching
people to cook out of the box; and we have community gardens, who of course
produce all of the stuff that goes into the boxes. That's been an enormous
asset that other communities very often don't have. What
we have identified as the major needs in this community from our perspective is
a community kitchen facility that people can use in order to process some of
this food so that it is available out of season; some way of partnering up with
community gardens so that they can find the space they need to garden, because
community gardens in Nanaimo is faced with a crisis in terms of finding
appropriate land; and some way to participate in the business model that will
emerge from this initiative. I'm
particularly enthusiastic about the co-op model because I've been looking at
business models for over forty years now. There are only three: you can only go
non-profit, private or co-op. I like the co-op model because it's democratic
and it can't get bought out from under you. So
the proposal that's coming out of this is to form a business co-op, which will
include a values change stretching from farmer to consumer. The role of Nanaimo
Foodshare has not yet been decided but we're certainly very interested in being
supportive of the Co-op. Jon Steinman: And that was Marjorie Stewart, the Chair
of Nanaimo Foodshare. Now what is forecasted to be able to take place is that
once the volumes of locally grown and processed food can make their way into
restaurants, businesses and institutions, it will then become financially
feasible to sell some of this food at cost to the not-for-profit agencies such
as those providing good food boxes to low-income eaters. And
as today's broadcast is looking to connect many of the pieces of the local food
puzzle together, we now arrive at another piece: labour. And this, too,
introduces another social service agency operating in Nanaimo. And that group
is the Nanaimo Association for Community Living (NACL), an organization
providing services to members of the community with disabilities. As it's this
demographic that faces some of the greatest employment challenges, it has
presented an ideal fit to fill the labour needs of farms and the processing
facilities of the Co-operative with those currently receiving services from
NACL. And
to help introduce how such an idea came about, we come back to Sandra Mark of
Edible Strategies, the consulting group that has put the business plan for the
co-op together. Sandra Mark: A student of mine was working with a group of folks who are
self-advocates - adults with developmental handicaps. And I was supporting her
in her work and met with these folks. There are about twenty young adults in
this group. I can't tell you
how moved I was to listen to these people talking about how everybody just
wanted them to do volunteer work. They would take training programs but the
minute their training was done and they were free labour then they wouldn't be
hired. They saw that people wouldn't hire them because they looked funny or
they talked funny. Those are their words: "People think we look funny. People
think we talk funny. They won't hire us. They don't think we are any good." Yet
between them this group of people had work history, they had training, they had
a very strong work ethic. They wanted to be part of something that made sense.
They didn't just want to be pushing a broom somewhere or hauling garbage or
whatever. They wanted to do something that they felt would really make a
difference in the world. So after meeting
with these folks and having cogitated on this labour problem and having had
experience in the past working with street folks, street kids, women on
welfare, First Nations youth - all of whom have difficulties entering the
labour market - we thought, "Well, could we engage some of the agencies who
support these folks to help us design a labour strategy?" So we went to the
Nanaimo Association for Community Living and said, "Look, this is what we are
trying to do. We feel moved to think that your folks could be leaders here."
Because as an organization they want to be seen to be contributing to the
community, not simply asking all the time for help and money and all that sort
of thing. They want to show that these folks can be productive. They don't have
to be the recipients of service. Jon Steinman: As the Executive Director of the Nanaimo
Association for Community Living, Graham Morry is now also one of the founding
Directors of the Heritage Foodservice Co-operative. Graham was also at the
farmers' market I attended in Nanaimo, and I spoke to him there about his
organization's involvement in helping re-localize Vancouver Islands' food
supply. Graham Morry: It was approximately twenty months ago that we became
involved when we were approached by Frank Moreland, who is a representative of
some farmers and they indicated a quite significant labour shortage. So we saw
this as a golden opportunity to build some really dignified employment for the
people we support on a long-term sustainable basis. We
support adults with developmental disabilities, and they range in challenges
from physical challenges to fairly extreme cognitive issues. But the
therapeutic component of working on a farm or agriculture has been clearly
identified. So we see this as something for all the people we support. There is
a place for everybody, whatever they may be doing. It may be one hour a week,
it may be forty; it depends on their abilities and their wants and dreams. Jon Steinman: One of the most startling figures that
Graham shared with me was the current unemployment rate of those with
disabilities. Graham Morry: The unemployment rate for people with disabilities can be
up to ninety per cent so it's always been a large barrier. But with the current
labour shortage we see another great opportunity. For employers they get really
a committed employee base, and the employers are willing to commit the extra
expense and time, because some of our of folks need more training basically
than with your typical employee. Jon Steinman: As is part of the Islands Good Food
Initiative that helped spawn the Heritage Foodservice Co-operative, the
training programs are in the planning stages as this show goes to air. And in wrapping
up my chat with Graham Morry he described the current quality of food that is
making its way into the group homes that NACL operates. He's optimistic that by
supporting local farmers through the this new co-operative, some healthier food
can then make its way to those living within the homes. Graham Morry: Most of our groceries are purchased regular (big box,
Quality Foods - that sort of thing), which is fine - they provide a service -
but we know there are greater nutrients in locally produced produce
specifically. And that means that our people are better cared for and they
don't get sick as often. Part
of our mandate - we are one of the largest non-profits in the mid-Island region
- is to give back to the community. We see ourselves as playing a pivotal role
in rebuilding the local food infrastructure through our own purchasing power.
We have a grocery bill of about a hundred and ten thousand a year and we are
committed to spending as much of that locally as we possibly can. Jon Steinman: And that was Graham Morry, the Executive
Director of the Nanaimo Association for Community Living. Graham is also a
founding Director of the Heritage Foodservice Co-operative Association. What
is one of the most important pieces within the model being created for this new
co-operative is the way in which value is added to the products coming off of
the local farms. In the long-distance food system that dominates Canada's food
supply, this is often where most of the money is made within the supply chain.
Now in the case of this new Heritage Foodservce Co-operative, that value will
be shared with the farmers, and let's come back to Sandra Mark of Edible
Strategies who describes this important piece of this foodservice co-operative.
Sandra Mark: The other piece of this is that the package of services
that will be bundled in. So it isn't just Joe Blow with his carrots: it's
getting those carrots to be prepared in
exactly the fashion that the restaurant, the institution or the consumer
requires it, and having the members of the business (of the Co-op) be the ones
who get the profit from this, again, because each individual farmer can't
probably invest in a whole value-added system itself. (I mean, there are some
who have been able to do, that but most can't.) But let's make sure that when
your product comes forward it is at the highest value it can go, that you will
get the highest dollar back, and the profit will be shared back to you. And
then making sure that the farmers and the labourers and the people that are now
ruled out the supply chain are ruled back into the supply chain. Jon Steinman: Sandra Mark introduced another important
player in the whole value chain, and that is the restaurant. Undertaking some
of the research that went into the creation of the Heritage Foodservice
Co-operative was James Street, the President of the North Vancouver Island
Chefs Association. Based in the community of Courtenay, James researched 110
restaurants around the island from forty seat cafes to 150-seat fine dining
operations, and I sat down with him in the offices of Edible Strategies in
Fanny Bay. This new co-operative is set to respond to some major concerns
facing restaurant owners, chefs and customers, and James first laid out some of
these problems. James Street: Well, there are many problems, one of which is that chefs
really want local food on the menus. They're feeling the pressure from the
consumers. What is happening is they don't have the time to try and source this
product. The human resources problems that are going on right now: there aren't
as many cooks as there was even three months ago. I was finding that most
kitchens that I spoke with in the past four months were at half capacity. If
they're trying to get local food on their menus next summer they have to go out
and source this stuff on their own, and they just don't have the time, the
convenience as well as the wholesale suppliers. There's an order sheet that
comes in front of them. They tick off what they need to order and then it shows
up the next day. In order for local food to get on those menus it needs to have
at least some of those conveniences. Jon Steinman: Prior to taking on a consultancy role
within the restaurant industry, James was a chef as well, and he uses himself
as an example in detailing the difficulties that chefs can face when trying to
link up with farmers to grow their ingredients. James Street: Well, just with myself I was
with the Old House Restaurant for a couple of years and it took those few years
to develop a relationship with one local producer, Jerry Patterson from
Patterson Farms, and just working out the logistics between both businesses so
that we could work out on a common ground. Getting together in November and
picking out the seeds out of the seed catalogues. Then I‘d have to go through
my analysis of my restaurant and make sure that I knew exactly how many carrots
I was going to go through at certain times of the year so he could implement
that into his crop rotation. So
there was a lot of negotiation and a lot of meetings and just trying to go over
the numbers over and over again. I had to make sure that the price was right
for me so I could charge it on to the consumer properly. And the producer had
to make sure that I was going to buy everything that he did grow, and he had to
produce even a little bit extra over and above what I was going to order so he
had an allowance for crop failure, or if he wanted to take some to the market.
It was a huge undertaking and it took about three years to dial it in. Jon Steinman: Now this is the process that many chefs
now go through in order to access local food. When I interviewed Michael
Allemeier of Mission Hill Winery's foodservice operation back in April of 2006,
we learned of the pages upon pages of local farmers that he has listed as
suppliers. It was during that broadcast that it was suggested that such a model
is not ideal for most restaurants. But
when the dominant foodservice distribution companies like Sysco and Gordon
Foodservice are so centralized in their operations, the alternatives for
restaurants or foodservice to access local food are non-existent. James
suggests how the Heritage Foodservice Co-op will respond to this. James Street: There are very few Vancouver Island producers, or even B.C.
producers for that matter, that are getting into the bulk wholesalers. Given
that they are not at the scale in which these wholesalers can work with them
effectively, they have to provide
enough product that that skew can be on the order sheet for more than a day.
Most local producers only have enough product that would last maybe even one
day or two days in their warehouse. So an economy of scale, or a combination of
these producers, so we can have some sort of distribution system where all of
it is collected together. It may not be George's carrots from George's farm but
a regional carrot brand. Jon Steinman: Another concern that many chefs are
facing on Vancouver Island is the availability of skilled labour. Without the
necessary labour, the time required to process and prepare food from scratch
increases. It's this very concern that the Co-operative is also looking to
respond to. James Street: Well, what we are finding is that there are a lot of chefs
retiring right now. A lot of them are in baby boomer demographic, so just like
every other industry in Canada we are facing that. And there are not a lot of
people coming into the trade. A lot of them are being pulled toward Alberta,
pulled toward construction. There was a huge boom in technology a few years
back and that took a very large section of the demographic. So we are not
having a large intake. Curriculums that
provide chef training are facing very low enrollment and schools are shutting
down and classes are being shut down. So the kitchens are really feeling the pinch.
And there is going to be a major reset here soon. Once the housing levels out
and the construction levels out then we'll find some people coming back to the
industry. But until that time
we have to find economies in the kitchen system themselves. So it may not be a
case of having carrots come in whole and with the peel on; they may have to
come in either peeled or pre-cut. We are looking at salad mixes; perhaps a
stocked kitchen that's providing stocks. Because the chefs do not have the time
to source out a lot of people with skills, and if they do have green people
come in, they don't have the time to start from scratch and train these people
up to provide the consistent products that they need. So if they have a
convenience product coming in from a supplier (albeit a wholesaler or local
food) - something say like a stock - then they can hit the ground running with
the kitchen. They don't have to spend a lot of time on labour. Jon Steinman: In closing out my conversation with
James Street of the North Vancouver Island Chefs Association, he concluded by
indicating how excited chefs on the Island are to know that such a co-operative
is being formed, to not only provide them with local food, but with product
that will also be prepared in such a way as to relieve them of the labour
shortage facing the industry. James Street: The chefs were very excited. The common response was,
"Well, it's about time." Many of them had been trying to do this on their own
and some of them said, "Well, I don't need any help. I have a few producers
that I'm working with." But, generally
they accepted that this was a fantastic opportunity to get more local on their
plate without them having to do the extra work. Because they feel like they are
on their own, they feel like they've been abandoned by the foodservice industry
on the whole because they are getting the pressure from the consumer but nobody
is helping them get this on the plate. Jon Steinman: And
that was James Street, the President of the North Vancouver Island Chefs
Association. I spoke with James during my recent visit to the Island. soundbite Jon Steinman: And
a quick reminder that if you missed any of today's broadcast it will be
archived on our website at cjly.net/deconstructingdinner where you can also subscribe
to our weekly podcast. As we near the end
of this Part III of our ongoing series titled "Co-operatives: Alternatives to
Industrial Food," we'll close out with some more segments from my time spent
with Frank Moreland and Sandra Mark of Edible Strategies. Frank and Sandra have
been at the forefront of accessing the financing required to help the Islands
Good Food Initiative spawn the creation of this Heritage Foodservice
Co-operative. And Sandra shared with me some of the many groups providing the necessary
finances. Sandra Mark: We need to find access to finance. Bankers and traditional financing
people have not been willing to put money into food and agriculture because of
what I just said: it doesn't make you any money right now. So we've had to work with what we call our "friendly financing group" -
credit unions, foundations, United Ways - who have been investing in food
projects on the non-profit side because they have those sorts of concerns.
We've gone to them with a whole bunch of partners and we've said to them, "We
need you to invest strategically. We need you to help us design a package of
investment tools, and granting tools, and development tools, but particularly
investment tools that will make it possible for us to begin to reinvest in this
sector." If we fail with the reinvestment strategy, all these things we're talking
about will almost be impossible. So it's really a critical and very difficult
problem. We feel encouraged, however, because we have had really good support
from Coast Capital Savings Credit Union, Van City Credit Union, the United Way
of the Lower Mainland, Western Economic Diversification, and the Enterprising
Non-Profit Program that brings several funders together. We've had
representatives from banks and other groups sitting in to figure out how they
could be part of this. And so there is currently a study group going on with
these people - Vancouver Foundation has been the lead - to figure out how they
can help us solve these problems. Jon Steinman: When looking at how and if other
communities across Canada could take on a similar project like the one featured
on today's broadcast, it's also important to look at the many barriers that may
hinder such a model for reclaiming greater control of local food systems. As
part of the research that went into this new business, Edible Strategies
approached the Environmental Law Centre at the University of Victoria, where
student Kendra Milne was put to the task of investigating what legal
barriers such a model may face. And here is Frank and Sandra describing some of
this research and, in particular, the restrictions placed on the raising and
processing of chicken through Canada's supply management system. Frank Moreland: We simply asked, "What are the legal barriers for local
food systems?" because we had been hearing over the email about TILMA and NAFTA
and how supply management systems were looking at special quota allocations. So
she worked for a full semester and wrote two memos. Sandra Mark: The bottom line here is that, in actual fact, you can think
about it: it is illegal in some ways to grown local stuff, particularly with
the supply management system, which we as farmers support. We are worried,
however, that the supply quotas can disappear from a region. There's a real
need to re-think the way quota systems work. We've talked to
chicken people, for example. We've lost most of our large chicken producers on
the Island because they just got too tired and there wasn't the ability for
processing over the last few years on the Island. They sold out: their quota
has gone to Abbotsford. I think the per cent I was told was we are now growing
twenty per cent of the chicken we eat on the Island, and we actually can't grow
anymore. Efforts are being made to have specialty chicken quota being created
and so on, but the rate at which quota is being created and the demand has got
a huge gap in between it. So we need to
understand how these things manifest, and then we have to figure out what is
the way around it. Can we work with the Farm Industry Review Board to deal with
some of these things? Is this something that has to come through citizen
action, or how can we get around them? Jon Steinman: The entire report compiled by
Kendra Milne will be linked to from the Deconstructing Dinner website. Another
important question that should most appropriately be addressed as part of our
ongoing series on co-operatives is why choose the co-operative model for this
particular business? The more common business models used in Canada are often
ones that prevent the effective implementing of social and environmental
principles to be incorporated into a business plan. But as Frank Moreland and
Sandra Mark indicate, the co-operative model they've chosen will help ensure
that such values can be upheld. Sandra Mark: When we were thinking about how to capture all of these
pieces, in a workshop that was held last spring with all the people who were
involved at that particular time, all of them really acknowledged that farmers
and the workers needed to be represented in the process because they are the
ones - that if we don't have the farmers and workers the whole thing is gone. They all decided
that they also wanted to have a way to share the eventual profits of the
business in an equitable fashion, particularly covering the needs of the
farmers and the workers. So the notion of a multi-stakeholder co-op came
forward so that each sector that is represented in this initiative would have a
seat on the Board. Frank Moreland: One element that I would like
to point out is that we needed to build a business that if it was successful
would not be bought out. If we look at Clodhoppers in Winnipeg, when they
finally got the order to fill Walmart they had to borrow so much money they
lost control of the business. When a private business that has social goals - and many of
them do - is sold to a public liability company that is traded on the public
stock exchange, all the social and environmental goals are lost, because the
single fiduciary responsibility is to maximize the profit to that shareholder.
So a co-operative, by having four of the directors or stakeholders as
businesses and one as a community organizational non-profit, we hope that that
business structure, if we are successful, we won't come under the pressures to
sell out to Unilever. Jon Steinman: Frank Moreland's last comment further
illustrates how social and environmental values are incorporated into Canada's
food system. On a policy level, Canada never really has maintained what could
be referred to as a food policy. Instead, what has been maintained in
Canada is better referred to as a commodity policy. Virtually all protections
and incentives paid to the agriculture and food sectors favour the production
of large-scale export crops and do not support the easy creation of local food
systems that foster social and environmental benefits. Sandra Mark: The fact that there is a supply problem is not well
understood and the reason for the supply problem isn't understood. Basically it
comes down to the fact that policies at the federal level in particular favour
commodity production and don't really favour food production. We don't have a
food policy in Canada. The result of all
this is that we are importing food much more cheaply than it can be produced
here. So the supply problem is the crux of trying to in fact fulfill that
demand that people are now manifesting. They want local food because they are
now understanding it is healthier. Climate change is being affected by the fact
that we are hauling food so far to our plates. On the Island here
we are concerned very particularly about food security. We have only a couple
of days worth of food at any one time. We only grow about six per cent of the
food we eat here. So there is really the issue of how secure is our food
system. This really calls
now to a resurgence for local community economic development - for communities
to look at how they can rebuild a system that used to be here. We used to
export food actually. On the Island we used to produce eighty-five per cent of
the food that was eaten here and exported. So it's not that we can't; in fact
we can. We have growing conditions and lots of agricultural land that could be
used, but we need to relearn how to make those connections once again. Jon Steinman: What is one of the more important
questions to end today's broadcast with is one that addresses whether the model
created for the Heritage Foodservice Co-operative will be able to exist
elsewhere in Canada and perhaps around the world. While this business will be
acting as somewhat of a pilot project, Frank Moreland predicts that the Island
has room for about fifty similar value chains. And with the other value chains
that do already exist, Frank also predicts that overall costs could eventually
be significantly reduced if more similar co-op models are adopted on the
Island. Frank Moreland: By starting small, working in
a niche market and educating all our partners that this isn't the only value
chain that can exist on Vancouver Island. This is a demonstration pilot project
and we actually have got potential for fifty value chains. If we have fifty
value chains on Vancouver Island, with all different commodities and different
food types and different market channels, each one of those value chains
invests in $150,000 to $200,000 dollars for their core administration. So
that's 200,000 times fifty. If there is one central administration doing that
as a service for all the value chains you can immediately see the cost relief. So we
are starting small, we're building the infrastructure, the bones that other
organizations and potential value chains…Natural Pastures' cheese is a value
chain; Lyle Young's chicken is a value chain. So we have got to actually
celebrate the existing value chains and say, "Look, we need more. The same cost
that everybody has - how can we share that cost and reduce it for everybody
involved?" Jon Steinman: And that was Frank Moreland
of Edible Strategies. At its core, today's broadcast has shared the basics of
one model through which communities across Canada can begin reshaping local and
regional food systems that provide healthier food; tastier food; food with a
lighter environmental footprint; food that invigorates local economies; and
food that, most importantly, provides farmers with the adequate finances they
deserve to grow and raise the very food that sustains us. We've heard recent examples here on Deconstructing Dinner of
carrots being grown in Ontario and being shipped to North Carolina, where in
that same community in Ontario, the carrots available in their grocery
stores are from North Carolina. We've heard of dungeness crab fished off
the coast of British Columbia and being shipped to China, where, after being
shelled, are then shipped back to Canada to be sold as Canadian crab. It was fitting to have spent time with Frank Moreland and
Sandra Mark in Fanny Bay, where we spoke of creating more efficient food
systems, because Fanny Bay is famous for one thing: oysters. In fact, virtually
the only business operating in the community is Fanny Bay Oysters. There we
were, walking into the one restaurant located in Fanny Bay, and - what came as
no surprise - the restaurant only had one order of oysters left. As I was told,
it's not because the product is in high demand, but because hardly anyone in
Fanny Bay eats oysters. You can learn more about the Islands' Good Food Initiative
and the Heritage Foodservice Co-operative by visiting the Deconstructing Dinner
website at cjly.net/deconstructingdinner. Today's broadcast will be archived
under November 29th 2007. Sandra Mark: The Islands' Good Food
Initiative will work because there are so many people who get that we need do
something and that we need to do it collectively. Frank and I have taken the
role of development and project managers and project developers. We are working
our hearts out on this because we really believe of the importance of this. We
want to eat good food. We want our families to be able to eat good food. We'd
like to see some sustainability in the picture. There's a lot of passion in
what we do. But it won't work if it's just our passion; it has to be
everybody's. And that's the thing that I feel the most encouragement from and
the most joy in: that we have so many people now who are taking this on, who
are saying, "This is my initiative; this is what we're doing. We're part of
something really important here." So we have reached that point where we no longer have to
push it: it's now rolling down the hill. It's wonderful. ending
theme And that was this week's edition of
Deconstructing Dinner, produced and recorded at Nelson, British Columbia's
Kootenay Co-op Radio. I've been your host Jon Steinman. I thank my technical
assistant John Ryan. The theme music for Deconstructing Dinner
is courtesy of Nelson-area resident Adham Shaikh. This
radio program is provided free of charge to campus/community radio stations
across the country, and relies on the financial support from you the listener. Support for the program can be donated
through our website at cjly.net/deconstructingdinner or by dialing
250-352-9600.
|